Musk Sparks Outrage by Labeling Federal Aid to Lutheran Groups "Illegal"
A weekend social media post by Elon Musk, head of the newly named Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), ignited a firestorm of controversy by declaring federal funding for Lutheran aid organizations as "illegal." Musk’s assertion, which echoed claims made by retired General Michael Flynn, accused the organizations of "money laundering" without providing any substantiating evidence. This sparked immediate condemnation from Lutheran leaders and aid organizations, who defended their longstanding partnerships with the government and highlighted their crucial work serving vulnerable populations. Bishop Elizabeth Eaton, presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), invoked the story of Saint Lawrence, a deacon martyred for defending the Church’s support of the poor, to underscore the historical commitment of the Church to charitable works.
The controversy erupted after Flynn shared a spreadsheet on X (formerly Twitter) detailing federal funding disbursed to various groups, including several Lutheran organizations, over the past two years. The spreadsheet, which also included non-Lutheran organizations, listed groups such as Global Refuge (formerly Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service), Lutheran colleges, and local chapters of Lutheran Social Services. Flynn’s post, which inflated the funding amounts to "billions" despite evidence to the contrary, quickly gained traction when Musk, a self-proclaimed "cultural Christian," amplified the accusations and declared that DOGE was actively halting these allegedly "illegal payments."
Global Refuge CEO Krish O’Mara Vignarajah vehemently denied the allegations, emphasizing the organization’s 85-year history of serving legally admitted refugees and immigrants, including Afghan allies and persecuted Christians who underwent extensive vetting by U.S. government agencies. Vignarajah underscored the organization’s bipartisan partnerships with previous administrations, highlighting their crucial role in protecting vulnerable children from human trafficking and facilitating reunification with families. Other Lutheran organizations, including Lutheran Social Services, which operates under the name Upbring in Texas, also provide vital social services, such as adoption assistance, through government partnerships.
Bishop Eaton’s response to the controversy resonated deeply with many. Recounting the story of Saint Lawrence, who defied Roman authorities by distributing the Church’s wealth to the poor, Eaton framed the current attacks as an assault on the Church’s fundamental mission of serving the most vulnerable. Her powerful message of courage and perseverance in the face of adversity underscored the unwavering commitment of the ELCA and its partners to continue their essential work, despite facing baseless accusations and misinformation.
The targeting of faith-based organizations comes amid a broader pattern of actions by the Trump administration that appear to undermine humanitarian efforts. Trump’s earlier executive order effectively froze the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, severely limiting refugee entry into the country. This action directly impacted the work of faith-based resettlement agencies like Global Refuge, seven of the ten organizations partnered with the government for refugee resettlement are faith-based. Vice President JD Vance has also recently targeted Catholic bishops, accusing them without evidence of resettling undocumented immigrants and prioritizing their "bottom line" over legitimate concerns.
Adding to the growing concern, the Trump administration initiated the dismantling of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) over the weekend, with Musk stating on X that DOGE had effectively "fed USAID into the wood chipper." This move has raised further alarms, given USAID’s historical partnerships with religious organizations like Lutheran World Relief and Catholic Relief Services, which carry out critical international development work. The implications of these actions remain uncertain, but many fear they signal a broader shift away from supporting vulnerable populations both domestically and internationally. The controversy surrounding the Lutheran aid organizations highlights the growing tension between the administration and faith-based groups, leaving many questioning the future of these crucial partnerships and their impact on those who rely on their services.
