Congress Urges Presidential Action on Anti-Fake News Legislation
The proliferation of disinformation and misinformation on social media has prompted calls for urgent legislative action. Representative Dan Fernandez of Santa Rosa City has appealed to President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. to certify bills penalizing the spread of fake news as urgent, highlighting the urgency of addressing this growing problem before the 19th Congress adjourns on June 11. During the final hearing of the House of Representatives’ tri-committee, Presidential Communications Office (PCO) Secretary Jay Ruiz emphasized the detrimental impact of false information on Filipinos’ ability to make informed decisions, underscoring the need for robust legislation to combat this issue.
The committee heard testimonies and discussed the need for a comprehensive legal framework to tackle the spread of fake news, drawing parallels with existing laws in Singapore and the European Union that regulate online platforms and penalize the dissemination of false information. Secretary Ruiz pointed out the inadequacy of the Philippines’ current Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 in addressing the complexity of online disinformation, advocating for a more specific law defining fake news, establishing penalties, and providing a framework for investigation and enforcement. He stressed the importance of such legislation for protecting the integrity of democratic processes and ensuring that voters have access to accurate information.
Several lawmakers echoed the concerns raised by Secretary Ruiz, emphasizing the urgency of the situation. Representative Johnny Pimentel of Surigao del Sur’s 2nd District stressed the importance of legal measures to counter the spread of falsehoods online, while Representative Fernandez lamented the limited time remaining in the current congressional session to address the issue. He urged President Marcos to certify relevant bills as urgent, enabling the 20th Congress to prioritize this legislation and potentially pass a law within a year. This call for presidential action reflects the growing consensus that fake news poses a significant threat to Philippine society and democracy.
The discussion of anti-fake news legislation follows recent incidents involving the spread of misinformation and disinformation targeting members of a House quad committee investigating illegal activities related to Philippine offshore gaming operators, the illicit drug trade, and extrajudicial killings. These incidents highlighted the potential for online falsehoods to undermine public trust in government institutions and disrupt ongoing investigations into sensitive issues. The committee summoned several social media personalities, including bloggers MJ Quiambao Reyes, Krizette Laureta Chu, and Mark Lopez, who subsequently issued apologies for spreading misleading or false claims.
The proposed bills, including House Bill No. 11506 filed by Representative Rufus Rodriguez and House Bill No. 11515 filed by Representative Geraldine Roman, aim to establish stricter measures against misinformation and disinformation. Rodriguez’s bill seeks to criminalize the spread of false information that threatens public order or national security, emphasizing that the right to free speech is not absolute and does not protect certain categories of harmful speech. Roman’s bill proposes the creation of a Digital Media Standards Coalition with the authority to investigate, issue directives, recommend sanctions, and collaborate with international fact-checkers, setting standards for digital media use and promoting accountability among online platforms.
The committee’s efforts to address the spread of fake news come amid growing international concern over the impact of online disinformation on democratic processes and societal stability. The experiences of other countries, such as Singapore and the members of the European Union, in implementing regulations against fake news provide valuable insights for the Philippines as it seeks to craft its own legal framework. The call for presidential certification of urgency underscores the seriousness of the issue and the need for swift and decisive action to protect the integrity of information and safeguard the democratic process.
