Spanish Newspaper La Vanguardia and The Guardian Abandon X (Formerly Twitter) Citing Toxicity and Misinformation
Barcelona-based newspaper La Vanguardia and British news outlet The Guardian have announced their withdrawal from social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, citing concerns over its increasingly toxic environment and proliferation of misinformation. Both publications pointed to the platform’s owner, Elon Musk, and his policies as contributing factors to this decline.
La Vanguardia explicitly criticized Musk’s self-proclaimed "free speech absolutism," arguing that it has led to X becoming an "echo chamber" for conspiracy theories, hate speech, and misinformation. The newspaper expressed particular concern over the lack of effective content moderation, which it believes has allowed harmful content targeting ethnic minorities, women, and other groups to proliferate. This lack of moderation, they argue, not only violates human rights but also incentivizes engagement and advertising revenue through sensationalized and harmful content. The newspaper cited the rise in bot activity and fake accounts contributing to disinformation around recent tragic flooding in Spain as further evidence of the platform’s deterioration.
The Guardian echoed these sentiments, labeling X a "toxic media platform" and criticizing Musk’s influence on political discourse. The newspaper stated that the decision to leave X had been under consideration for some time, but the recent US election, and Musk’s purported involvement in shaping election-related discussions and narratives, solidified their decision. They argued that the resources previously dedicated to maintaining a presence on X could be better utilized elsewhere to promote their journalism.
Both publications highlighted the contrast between Musk’s stated commitment to free speech and the reality of the platform’s current state. They argued that the reduction in content moderation, coupled with the reinstatement of previously banned accounts known for spreading conspiracy theories, has created an environment hostile to responsible journalism and public discourse. This environment, they believe, actively promotes the spread of harmful misinformation and undermines efforts to combat it.
The decisions by La Vanguardia and The Guardian follow a pattern of growing concern among media organizations and individuals regarding the direction of X under Musk’s leadership. The mass layoffs of content moderation staff, along with the relaxation of previously established rules and guidelines, have created a breeding ground for problematic content. This has led to accusations that Musk’s vision of a "free speech" platform has, in reality, facilitated the spread of disinformation and hate speech.
While both publications have ceased posting new content on X, they have maintained a passive presence. This means they will continue to monitor accounts of individuals, businesses, and institutions to stay informed about conversations and developments on the platform. Journalists from both organizations are also permitted to continue using X individually, but with the expectation that they adhere to ethical guidelines regarding respect for human rights and responsible use of free speech. This nuanced approach reflects the ongoing dilemma faced by many: balancing the potential benefits of accessing information on X with the risks posed by its increasingly toxic environment.
The departure of established news organizations like La Vanguardia and The Guardian from X raises significant questions about the future of the platform and its role in the media landscape. Their decisions signal a growing distrust of Musk’s leadership and a rejection of the platform’s current trajectory. Whether this exodus will prompt any meaningful change in X’s policies and practices remains to be seen. However, it undeniably highlights the growing tension between the ideal of free speech and the responsibility to combat harmful misinformation in the digital age.