Influencers Apologize for Spreading Disinformation on Social Media During House Hearing
MANILA, Philippines – A House of Representatives tri-committee investigation into the proliferation of fake news on social media platforms led to several social media influencers issuing apologies for spreading unverified information. The hearing, held on Friday, saw Krizette Laureta Chu, Mary Jane Quiambao Reyes, and Mark Lopez facing scrutiny from lawmakers over their misleading posts. The committee, chaired by Manila Rep. Bienvenido Abante, highlighted the dangers of disseminating false information and the responsibility that social media users, particularly those with large followings, bear in verifying their claims.
Rep. Abante strongly reprimanded Chu for her posts containing unsubstantiated allegations, often perceived as pro-Duterte. He demanded an apology after Chu admitted that her statements were based solely on news reports without corroborating evidence. Abante challenged the credibility of Chu’s claims, particularly one post criticizing the government, by highlighting the lack of supporting documentation. While Chu initially defended her post as an expression of opinion, she eventually apologized for using offensive language.
Tingog party-list Rep. Jude Acidre questioned Chu about a Facebook post regarding the alleged resignation of police officers following the arrest of former President Rodrigo Duterte. Chu admitted that the basis of her claim was unverified TikTok videos, leading Acidre to characterize her post as a propagated rumor and a lie. Chu’s defense that the use of the word “daw” (supposedly) implied uncertainty was rejected by Acidre, who emphasized the responsibility of journalists and social media users to verify information before disseminating it. Acidre underscored the potential legal ramifications of spreading misinformation, particularly concerning national security, and pressed Chu for an apology, which she refused.
Abang Lingkod party-list Rep. Stephen Joseph Paduano confronted Quiambao-Reyes about a post claiming that extrajudicial killings (EJKs) related to the war on drugs were a hoax. Paduano demanded evidence to support her claim. Quiambao-Reyes admitted under oath to having no documentation to substantiate her allegation. She conceded that she should have gathered documented evidence before making such a serious claim and pledged to be more diligent in verifying information in the future.
The hearing also saw Mark Lopez admitting to spreading false information regarding the South China Sea. Lopez’s straightforward apology to the panel for disseminating fake news underscored the growing awareness of the problem of misinformation and the willingness of some influencers to take responsibility for their actions.
The hearing served as a stark reminder of the dangers of spreading misinformation online and the responsibility that social media users, particularly influencers, have in verifying their claims before sharing them with their followers. The apologies offered by some of the influencers, while a positive step, also highlighted the need for continued efforts to combat the spread of fake news and hold those responsible accountable. The lawmakers stressed the potential legal repercussions for spreading false information, particularly when it concerns matters of national security. This investigation signals a stronger stance by the House of Representatives in addressing the issue of online misinformation and its potential consequences.
The committee emphasized the importance of media literacy and critical thinking in the face of the overwhelming information available online. The representatives called for social media users to be more discerning and responsible in sharing information, especially when it comes from unverified sources. This scrutiny of influencer behavior reflects a larger societal concern about the impact of social media on public discourse and the need for greater accountability in the digital sphere. The hearing also highlighted the crucial role of legitimate journalism in providing verified and accurate information and the importance of distinguishing between credible news sources and unreliable online content. The investigation marks a significant step in the House of Representatives’ efforts to combat the spread of disinformation and uphold the integrity of information shared online. The focus on influencer accountability underscores the growing recognition of their power to shape public opinion and the need for responsible use of their platforms. It also serves as a warning to social media users to be more vigilant in verifying information before sharing it, contributing to a more informed and responsible online environment.
