Indonesia’s Rafale Jet Deal Under Fire: Disinformation Campaign Targets French Defense Contract
A sophisticated disinformation campaign targeting the Indonesian government’s agreement to purchase 42 Rafale fighter jets from French manufacturer Dassault Aviation has been uncovered, raising concerns about foreign interference in the country’s defense procurement process. French intelligence points fingers at Beijing, alleging that Chinese officials have been actively spreading rumors and lobbying to steer Indonesia towards purchasing Chinese-made J-10 fighter jets instead. This campaign leverages existing anti-Western sentiment within Indonesia, aiming to undermine the Rafale deal and promote Chinese alternatives.
Independent research corroborates these claims, revealing a concerted effort to manipulate public opinion in Indonesia against the Rafale acquisition. Beginning in May and June, a surge of social media activity, particularly on platforms like TikTok and X (formerly Twitter), promoted a narrative highlighting the purported superiority of the J-10. This campaign cleverly exploited a May incident involving an India-Pakistan aerial clash, falsely portraying the J-10 as having shot down Indian Rafale jets. This narrative quickly gained traction, amplified by manipulated videos and AI-generated imagery.
The disinformation campaign skillfully played on nationalistic and religious sentiments. Fabricated stories circulated about a female Pakistani pilot, Ayesha Farooq, supposedly flying a J-10 and downing Indian Rafales. Videos featuring actual footage of another Pakistani pilot, Marium Mukhtiar, who died in 2015, were misrepresented as Farooq, further fueling the fabricated narrative. The image of a hijab-wearing Muslim heroine resonated deeply with Indonesian audiences, garnering significant attention and even inspiring some parents to name their newborns after the fictionalized pilot.
Investigation into the origins of this disinformation campaign points towards Chinese and Russian actors, though conclusive evidence of direct state sponsorship remains elusive. The initial Indonesian-language social media posts celebrating the alleged Pakistani air force victory were traced back to translated Chinese content. Videos circulated featuring Pakistani influencers praising the J-10’s performance and purportedly causing Dassault Aviation’s stock price to plummet. Chinese-Indonesian influencers with links to Chinese state media further amplified these messages.
Adding another layer to this complex web of disinformation, Russian online platforms also played a role. A Russian website published a false report claiming that Indonesia had suspended the Rafale purchase, a claim quickly debunked by Indonesian authorities. This fabricated story was then picked up and amplified by an Indonesian news site known for disseminating pro-Russian and pro-Chinese narratives, fueling a hashtag campaign on X calling for the cancellation of the Rafale deal. Analysis of the hashtag activity suggests coordinated inauthentic amplification.
Despite the considerable reach of this disinformation campaign, it appears to have had limited impact on the Indonesian government’s decision-making process. Leaked information suggesting that the Chinese embassy was attempting to persuade Indonesian officials to purchase second-hand J-10s at discounted prices was met with widespread online mockery and ridicule. While discussions with China regarding potential aircraft purchases seemingly remain stalled, Indonesia recently announced an order for 48 KAAN fighter jets from Türkiye, further demonstrating a diversified approach to defense procurement.
This incident highlights the vulnerability of Indonesia’s defense sector to foreign influence operations, particularly those exploiting pre-existing anti-Western sentiment. While Indonesia continues to diversify its sources of military equipment to avoid over-reliance on any single supplier, particularly Western nations, this incident underscores the need for heightened awareness and robust counter-disinformation strategies. The campaign’s exploitation of nationalist and religious themes demonstrates the sophistication of these operations and their potential to manipulate public opinion and potentially influence policy decisions. Indonesia’s experience serves as a cautionary tale for other nations navigating the complex landscape of international defense procurement in an era of increasingly sophisticated information warfare.