Over 750 HHS Employees Accuse Kennedy of Fueling Misinformation and Endangering Public Health
In an unprecedented display of dissent, over 750 current and former employees of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), including staff from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), have signed a scathing letter rebuking Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for his dissemination of misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, which they argue contributed to a recent fatal shooting at CDC headquarters. The letter, published on Save HHS, a platform dedicated to protecting public health infrastructure, directly implicates Kennedy in eroding public trust and jeopardizing the safety of HHS personnel. The employees demand that Kennedy cease spreading inaccurate health information, reaffirm the scientific integrity of the CDC, and guarantee the safety of the HHS workforce by September 2nd.
The letter comes in the wake of a tragic incident on August 8th, where a gunman opened fire at the CDC complex in Atlanta, killing Officer David Rose. The assailant reportedly blamed the COVID-19 vaccine for his mental health struggles, a narrative that aligns with some of Kennedy’s previously espoused views. The employees’ letter explicitly points to Kennedy’s history of disseminating false information about vaccines, disbanding crucial advisory panels, and making disparaging remarks about the CDC, including labeling it a “cesspool of corruption,” as contributing factors to the climate of mistrust that may have fueled the attack.
The employees express deep concern over Kennedy’s actions, asserting that he is “complicit in dismantling America’s public health infrastructure and endangering the nation’s health.” They argue that his persistent dissemination of inaccurate health information, coupled with his attacks on established scientific institutions, has created an environment ripe for violence and mistrust. This direct challenge to a sitting cabinet secretary by such a large number of federal employees represents an extraordinary level of internal opposition and highlights the deep divisions within the HHS under Kennedy’s leadership.
While an HHS spokesperson defended Kennedy, claiming his visit to Atlanta after the shooting demonstrated his support for CDC staff and that linking public health reforms to the shooter’s actions politicizes a tragedy, the employees remain unconvinced. They see a direct link between Kennedy’s rhetoric and the escalating hostility towards public health officials. The spokesperson also emphasized Kennedy’s commitment to transparency as a means of restoring public trust, stating that “telling the truth” is crucial for regaining public confidence. However, critics argue that Kennedy’s own track record of promoting unsubstantiated claims undermines this very message.
This internal conflict within the HHS coincides with a significant divergence in COVID-19 vaccine guidance between the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). For the first time in three decades, the AAP has broken from the CDC’s recommendations, opting to continue recommending COVID-19 vaccines for children aged six months to two years and older children with chronic medical conditions. This departure highlights the growing concerns among medical professionals regarding the CDC’s revised guidelines under Kennedy’s leadership, which no longer recommend the vaccine for healthy children. The AAP emphasizes that its decision is based on scientific evidence and pediatric expertise, not political considerations.
The controversy surrounding Kennedy’s leadership is not new. Even before his confirmation as health secretary, he was a prominent figure in the anti-vaccine movement, known for promoting discredited theories linking vaccines to autism. His appointment was met with widespread criticism from public health organizations and medical groups, who warned that his views could undermine decades of progress in disease prevention. Since taking office, Kennedy has doubled down on his skepticism towards vaccines and has actively sought to reshape immunization policies, further fueling concerns about the future of public health under his stewardship. The letter from the HHS employees represents the latest and perhaps most significant expression of these concerns, marking a rare instance of such a large-scale internal challenge to a sitting cabinet secretary. The employees’ demands and the September 2nd deadline they have set create a high-stakes situation with potentially significant ramifications for the future of the HHS and the nation’s public health. The outcome of this standoff remains uncertain, as does the long-term impact of Kennedy’s leadership on the HHS and public health policy.
