Gaza Aid Dispute: Humanitarian Foundation Chief Rejects UN Casualty Figures, Sparking Controversy

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has found itself at the center of a heated debate over aid distribution in the war-torn Gaza Strip. Johnnie Moore, the GHF’s executive director, has dismissed United Nations figures on casualties at aid distribution points as "disinformation," sparking a sharp rebuke from established humanitarian organizations. The UN reported that at least 410 Palestinians have been killed while seeking food aid since Israel lifted its 11-week blockade on May 19th. Meanwhile, the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry has placed the death toll at a higher figure of at least 549. Mr. Moore, an evangelical preacher and former White House advisor during the Trump administration, alleges a deliberate campaign to undermine the GHF’s efforts in Gaza. He claims the foundation has delivered over 44 million meals to Gazans since commencing operations in May.

The GHF, backed by both Israel and the United States, has faced significant resistance from established aid organizations, including the UN, which have refused to cooperate with the new entity. These groups contend that Israel is using food aid as a weapon, and that the GHF’s distribution system will be ineffective, potentially leading to further displacement of Palestinians. They argue that the GHF lacks the necessary expertise and capacity to meet the local needs and that its operations violate established humanitarian principles, which prohibit warring parties from controlling humanitarian assistance. The GHF is currently distributing food packages, purportedly sufficient to feed 5.5 people for 3.5 days, at four locations, primarily in southern Gaza.

Criticism of the GHF’s operations and Mr. Moore’s statements has been swift and pointed. Data and forensics correspondent Tom Cheshire described Moore’s Sky News interview as "really political, really punchy," highlighting concerns that the GHF is too politically aligned to operate effectively as a neutral humanitarian organization. Traditionally, aid distribution in Gaza has been handled by neutral bodies like the UN. Israel, however, has long criticized this system, blaming Hamas for alleged looting of aid supplies. Cheshire noted that the Israeli Prime Minister’s office, while accusing Hamas of disinformation, failed to provide evidence to support its own claims. The core concern, according to Cheshire, is that the GHF’s close ties to Israel and the US compromise its neutrality.

Concerns have also been raised about the strategic location of the GHF distribution points. With a limited number of sites, primarily in southern Gaza, Palestinians are forced to travel long distances, often through dangerous Israeli military zones, to access aid. This forced movement, critics argue, could serve a political objective of displacing the population while ostensibly providing humanitarian assistance. Witnesses report frequent instances of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) opening fire on crowds attempting to reach the aid hubs, resulting in numerous casualties. Both the UN and the Hamas-run health ministry corroborate reports of hundreds of people killed or wounded in these incidents.

Aid workers on the ground paint a grim picture of the situation. Rachael Cummings, Save the Children’s team leader in Gaza, told Sky News that Palestinians are being coerced into risking their lives at the "American- and Israeli-backed, militarised, food distribution points" out of desperation. A Gazan man echoed these sentiments, describing the aid sites as "a trap" designed to displace the population rather than provide genuine assistance. These accounts starkly contrast with Mr. Moore’s claims. While acknowledging casualties, Mr. Moore attributes them to the ongoing conflict and the complexities of operating in a densely populated and volatile environment. He claims that the GHF is cooperating with the IDF to investigate incidents of violence, while accusing Hamas of intentionally harming people to discredit the foundation’s work.

The controversy surrounding the GHF deepened with the US State Department’s announcement of $30 million in funding for the organization, despite internal opposition from some US officials. Concerns were raised about the escalating violence near distribution sites, the GHF’s lack of experience, and the involvement of for-profit US logistics and private military firms. While a spokesperson for the UN’s humanitarian coordination office expressed openness to dialogue with the GHF, they emphasized that the current aid distribution process in Gaza is neither dignified nor adheres to humanitarian principles. Oxfam CEO Halima Begum strongly criticized Mr. Moore’s claims, stating that they "fly in the face of everything we, and other trusted humanitarian agencies, are seeing on the ground." She reiterated urgent calls for a ceasefire, the release of hostages, and the delivery of humanitarian assistance through experienced and neutral organizations like the UN and Oxfam to avert a looming humanitarian catastrophe.

Share.
Exit mobile version