Government Rejects Rahul Gandhi’s Claim of Pre-Informing Pakistan About Operation Sindoor
A sharp political tussle erupted on Saturday between the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the opposition Congress party, sparked by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s accusation that the government had informed Pakistan in advance about Operation Sindoor, India’s retaliatory strikes against terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan-administered Kashmir following a terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) swiftly responded, categorically denying the claim and accusing Gandhi of "utter misrepresentation" of facts.
The controversy stemmed from a video clip shared by Gandhi on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, in which External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar is purportedly heard saying that India had informed Pakistan about the strikes. Gandhi seized upon this clip, alleging that informing Pakistan beforehand constituted a "crime" and demanding to know who had authorized such a decision and what the consequences were for the Indian Air Force. He directly questioned the rationale behind such a move, implying that it compromised the operation’s effectiveness.
However, the MEA clarified that Jaishankar’s words were taken out of context. The ministry emphasized that the minister was referring to the period immediately after the commencement of Operation Sindoor, not before. The MEA’s statement stressed that the communication to Pakistan served as a warning, clearly differentiating between military targets and terrorist infrastructure, and offered the Pakistani military the opportunity to avoid involvement. The ministry condemned the distortion of Jaishankar’s statement, calling it a deliberate attempt to mislead the public.
The Press Information Bureau (PIB), the government’s nodal agency for disseminating information, further corroborated the MEA’s stance, issuing a fact-check that debunked the claim that Jaishankar had admitted to pre-informing Pakistan. The PIB reiterated that the minister’s words were being misquoted to create a false narrative. This assertion reinforced the government’s position that the communication with Pakistan was a post-strike warning, not a pre-emptive notification.
Operation Sindoor, launched in response to the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, targeted terrorist camps in Pakistan’s Punjab province and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. The Indian government, then led by Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, authorized the operation as a direct response to the escalating cross-border terrorism. This military action aimed to dismantle terrorist infrastructure and send a strong message of deterrence to Pakistan.
This latest exchange between the Congress and the BJP comes amidst heightened political activity in the lead-up to the 2024 general elections. The controversy surrounding Operation Sindoor further intensifies the ongoing debate on national security and the government’s handling of cross-border terrorism. The accusations and counter-accusations between the two parties underscore the deep political divisions within the country on these critical issues. The government’s firm denial and the PIB’s fact-check aim to control the narrative and counter the opposition’s attempts to question its national security credentials. This incident highlights the increasing use of social media as a battleground for political discourse, often marked by the rapid spread of misinformation and the need for swift clarification.
