Google Under Scrutiny for Alleged Role in Monetizing Misinformation During Southport Riots
The tech giant Google is facing accusations of indirectly fueling the devastating Southport riots last summer by monetizing a website that spread misinformation about the attacker’s identity. This revelation emerged during a parliamentary committee hearing on misinformation, where MPs revealed an unpublished report from digital advertising watchdog Check My Ads. The report alleges that Google’s advertising network profited from a site peddling false information about the attacker, including claims that he was an asylum seeker who had recently arrived in the UK. This misinformation is believed to have contributed to the widespread violence and unrest that followed the tragic murder of three girls in Southport.
Google’s European managing director for trust and safety, Amanda Storey, responded to the allegations during the hearing, stating that such activity would be a clear violation of the company’s policies. She expressed a willingness to investigate the matter thoroughly and understand how such a breach could have occurred. Storey acknowledged the immense challenge of combating the rapid spread of misinformation, especially in emotionally charged situations like the Southport riots. She highlighted the "viral spread" of misinformation on social media and the difficulty in containing its "echo" across other online platforms.
The parliamentary committee also discussed the potential impact of the upcoming Online Safety Act, which aims to hold online platforms accountable for harmful content. Storey suggested that the Act could have "made a difference" in mitigating the spread of misinformation during the Southport riots. She emphasized that Google, being a search engine rather than a social media platform, operates in a different context than social media giants when it comes to misinformation. This distinction, she argued, lessened Google’s involvement in the specific events surrounding the Southport riots, albeit acknowledging the tragedy and offering sympathy to the victims’ families.
However, committee member Emily Darlington challenged Google’s attempt to distance itself from the controversy, highlighting the evidence presented regarding the monetization of the misinformation-spreading website. Darlington pressed Storey on whether Google had conducted any internal reflection on how its advertising and monetization practices might have contributed to the spread of misinformation and the subsequent riots. Darlington’s line of questioning directly challenged Google’s narrative, implying that their role went beyond simply being a passive observer in the events.
In response to Darlington’s pointed questions, Storey assured the committee that Google conducts thorough post-mortem analyses of real-world harm situations, including the Southport riots. These analyses, she explained, involve identifying the root causes of any failures and implementing corrective actions to prevent similar incidents in the future. Storey committed to providing the committee with more detailed information about this process. This response emphasized Google’s internal review mechanisms and commitment to learn from past events, seeking to reassure the committee of their proactive approach towards online safety.
The parliamentary hearing underscored the complex and multifaceted nature of online misinformation and its potential real-world consequences. The Southport riots serve as a stark example of how false information can rapidly escalate into violence and unrest. The committee’s scrutiny of Google, and its advertising practices, highlights the growing concern over the role of tech companies in combating the spread of misinformation. The upcoming Online Safety Act and its potential impact on platforms like Google will undoubtedly be a key area of focus as the UK government seeks to create a safer and more accountable online environment. The debate surrounding the responsibilities of tech companies in addressing misinformation is likely to continue, with increasing pressure on platforms to implement more effective safeguards and prevent similar tragedies in the future.
