A Web of Deception: Cuban Official Spreads Falsehood About Singer’s Deportation
Gerardo Hernández Nordelo, the former Cuban spy turned head of the Committees for the Defense of the Revolution (CDR), recently became embroiled in a controversy surrounding a fabricated story he shared on social media. Hernández posted a manipulated video that falsely connected a Cuban singer’s support for Donald Trump to the deportation of her husband. The video spliced together footage of the pro-Trump musical group "Los 3 de La Habana" performing with a separate clip of a woman weeping over her husband’s detention by ICE agents. Hernández’s post falsely identified the crying woman as Janet Correa, a member of “Los 3 de La Habana,” and suggested her husband’s deportation was retribution for her political stance. This misinformation quickly went viral, sparking outrage and condemnation from journalists, artists, and internet users.
The truth, however, was far different. The woman in the video was not Janet Correa, the singer from “Los 3 de La Habana,” but another Cuban woman, also named Janet Correa, a legal US resident whose husband had been detained on unrelated immigration matters. The actual singer, Ana Páez, confirmed she was not the woman in the video and denounced the fabrication. The source of Hernández’s misinformation appears to be a post by a social media account known as "SVCNoticias," which had previously shared the misleadingly edited video. Hernández, rather than verifying the information, amplified the lie, adding his own mocking commentary that framed the deportation as a consequence of supporting a US political figure.
The incident drew sharp criticism due to its manipulative nature and exploitation of a real person’s distress. Janet Correa, whose emotional reaction to her husband’s detention had been captured on video, became an unwitting pawn in Hernández’s disinformation campaign. Her genuine grief was misrepresented and weaponized to serve a political narrative. This callous disregard for the truth and the emotional well-being of individuals further tarnished Hernández’s reputation as a purveyor of propaganda.
Prominent figures within the Cuban community were quick to debunk the falsehood and condemn Hernández’s actions. Journalist Mario J. Pentón exposed the fabrication, highlighting the desperation of the Cuban regime to spread misinformation. Filmmaker Ian Padrón also criticized Hernández’s dishonesty, urging him to conduct even basic fact-checking before disseminating such inflammatory content. The incident underscored the growing concern over the spread of misinformation and the role of government officials in perpetuating false narratives.
The case highlights the ethical considerations surrounding the use of sensitive footage in political propaganda. Janet Correa’s video, originally capturing a private moment of grief, was lifted from its context and manipulated to create a false narrative. This act raises questions about privacy, consent, and the responsibility of individuals and organizations to verify information before sharing it publicly. The incident serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for misinformation to exploit personal tragedies for political gain.
This episode reinforces Hernández’s reputation as a prominent figure in the Cuban regime’s propaganda apparatus. His willingness to spread demonstrably false information aligns with a broader pattern of misinformation and censorship employed by the Cuban government. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of media literacy and critical thinking in the age of rapidly spreading information, particularly when that information originates from sources with a history of manipulating the truth. It also highlights the vulnerability of individuals caught in the crosshairs of political propaganda, and the need for vigilance in identifying and countering disinformation campaigns.
