TikTok’s Tan Line Trend Sparks Debate on Misinformation and Sunscreen Use
A recent trend on TikTok has ignited a contentious debate over the spread of misinformation regarding sunscreen use and the platform’s ability to effectively combat it. The trend involves users lip-syncing to an audio clip declaring, "I mean, I’d rather die hot than live ugly," while showcasing their tan lines, ostensibly promoting the idea that a tan is preferable to the perceived inconvenience or unattractiveness of sunscreen application. This trend, facilitated by TikTok’s algorithmic content delivery system, has raised concerns among experts about the platform’s potential to amplify potentially harmful messages about sun safety.
Social media researcher Lauren Miller from Swinburne University highlights the platform’s vulnerability to misinformation. Unlike platforms like Instagram, where users primarily engage with content from accounts they actively follow, TikTok’s algorithm curates a personalized feed based on user engagement, regardless of the source’s credibility. This means users are frequently exposed to content from a wide range of creators, including those who may be spreading inaccurate or misleading information about sunscreen and its importance in protecting against skin cancer. This algorithmic approach, while effective at driving engagement, also presents a significant challenge in preventing the spread of misinformation, as it can quickly amplify questionable content to a vast audience.
Further exacerbating the problem is the observed trend of users actively engaging in anti-sunscreen rhetoric within the comments sections of posts by medical professionals and dermatologists. This targeted dissemination of misinformation directly undermines the efforts of credible sources to provide accurate information about sun safety. While TikTok has implemented a STEM feed initiative aimed at promoting science-based content, experts like Miller express skepticism about its effectiveness in reaching those already entrenched in a distrust of science-backed institutions. The algorithm, geared towards popularity and engagement rather than factual accuracy, may inadvertently prioritize content that reinforces existing biases rather than exposing users to alternative perspectives.
TikTok maintains that it has robust community guidelines in place to combat harmful misinformation and that these guidelines are applied to all content, including comments. The platform claims to have removed 1.3 million videos in Australia alone between July and September of last year for violating these guidelines, underscoring their commitment to maintaining a safe and informative online environment. Furthermore, they highlight the STEM feed’s growing popularity, boasting that one in three young people in markets where it is available visit the feed weekly, with a 35% increase in STEM content overall.
To ensure the accuracy of information presented on the STEM feed, TikTok has partnered with independent fact-checking organizations like Common Sense Networks and the Poynter Institute. Common Sense Networks assesses the appropriateness of videos for the STEM feed, while Poynter cross-checks factual claims. This two-week vetting process, according to TikTok, helps to guarantee that the content presented is both engaging and factually sound. Promotional or sponsored content is strictly prohibited within the STEM feed, further reinforcing the platform’s commitment to providing unbiased, science-based information.
Despite these efforts, concerns remain about the effectiveness of these measures in combating the rapid spread of misinformation. Science communication expert Michelle Riedlinger, an associate professor at the Queensland University of Technology, emphasizes the importance of promoting accurate content alongside independent fact-checking. She argues that simply removing misleading content is insufficient; proactively promoting credible sources and providing users with easy access to accurate information is crucial in countering the influence of misinformation. The inherent tension between prioritizing engagement and ensuring accuracy within TikTok’s algorithmic structure presents an ongoing challenge for the platform as it strives to balance entertainment value with its responsibility to combat the spread of potentially harmful misinformation. The "die hot than live ugly" trend serves as a stark reminder of this ongoing battle and the need for continued vigilance in promoting accurate information about sun safety and other critical health issues.
