Looming Post-Election Disinformation and Violence Threaten Democratic Stability: Experts Warn of Potential for Unprecedented Upheaval
As the 2024 election draws to a close, concerns are mounting about the potential for widespread disinformation and violence in the days and weeks following Election Day. Experts from the Defend Democracy Project warn that the current political climate, marked by extreme polarization and a proliferation of false narratives, creates a fertile ground for unrest that could surpass the turmoil witnessed during the 2020 presidential transition. The tight margins in several key races, including the presidential contest and control of Congress, further amplify these anxieties, as delayed results and potential recounts could leave a vacuum for speculation and manipulation. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the potential for bad actors to exploit the uncertainty and sow discord, potentially inciting violence and undermining public trust in the democratic process.
One of the most significant concerns revolves around the spread of disinformation, particularly regarding election integrity. Olivia Troye, a former homeland security and counterterrorism advisor to Vice President Mike Pence, expressed alarm about the potential for false claims of election fraud to take hold and incite violence, mirroring the events of January 6, 2021. These concerns are echoed by an FBI and Department of Homeland Security bulletin warning that candidates, elected officials, election workers, members of the media, and judges could become targets of post-election violence. The recent incidents of ballot box burning in Oregon and Washington states add another layer of concern about physical threats to the electoral process itself.
The tight margins anticipated in this election cycle raise the stakes even higher. Michael Podhorzer, chair of the Defend Democracy Project, highlights the potential for a single state’s electoral votes to decide the presidency, creating a scenario where manipulating the outcome in a single state could have outsized consequences. Unlike 2020, where President Biden’s relatively comfortable margin of victory discouraged attempts to overturn the results, a narrow win by either candidate in 2024 could embolden efforts to challenge the outcome, potentially leading to a constitutional crisis. This heightened vulnerability necessitates a proactive approach to combating disinformation and ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.
Public opinion reflects the widespread anxiety surrounding the election and its aftermath. A recent survey by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research reveals that while a vast majority of registered voters believe the losing candidate should accept the results, a significant portion doubts that Donald Trump will concede if defeated. This skepticism underscores the deep partisan divisions that permeate the electorate and the erosion of trust in democratic norms. Moreover, the survey reveals widespread concern about post-election violence, with a majority of respondents expressing anxiety about attempts to overturn the election results and targeted violence against political figures and election officials.
Beyond domestic threats, concerns about foreign interference in the election also loom large. The survey highlights significant concern among voters about foreign influence on public opinion and the integrity of the election process. This anxiety is underscored by a recent incident involving a fake video about ballots in Pennsylvania produced by Russian actors. This incident, along with other attempts to spread disinformation and undermine confidence in the election, highlights the need for vigilance against foreign interference and a robust response to counter these threats. The bipartisan National Council on Election Integrity emphasizes the importance of upholding the rule of law and rejecting attempts to manipulate the electoral process, regardless of political affiliation.
Despite the pervasive anxiety and partisan divisions, glimmers of unity have emerged in response to certain events. The condemnation of a comedian’s offensive remarks about Puerto Rico during a Trump rally demonstrates a rare instance of bipartisan agreement. Republicans and Democrats alike criticized the comedian’s comments, highlighting a shared commitment to respecting the dignity of all Americans, regardless of their background or origin. This incident, albeit a small one, offers a reminder that common ground can still be found even in a highly polarized political environment.
