Duterte’s ICC Arrest Fuels Disinformation Campaign, Sparking International Concern
The arrest of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte by the International Criminal Court (ICC) has ignited a firestorm of misinformation and disinformation, spreading rapidly across social media platforms and reaching even the halls of the international tribunal itself. Lawmakers and legal experts have expressed grave concerns over the fabricated narratives and blatant falsehoods circulating online, which they warn could undermine legal proceedings and damage the country’s reputation on the global stage.
The disinformation campaign, fueled by Duterte loyalists and amplified by social media algorithms, has taken various forms. False claims about Duterte’s health, his supposed disappearance, and the denial of proper medical care have proliferated online. Even more troubling are the targeted attacks against ICC Presiding Judge Lulia Motoc, who has been subjected to online harassment and false accusations on platforms like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and LinkedIn. Some posts have falsely linked Judge Motoc to Philippine First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, while others have used satirical images of fictional judges and lawyers to call for Duterte’s release, further muddying the waters of truth and justice.
Representative Paolo Ortega V has condemned the spread of these false narratives, characterizing the situation as "humiliating" and a source of national shame. He has emphasized the need to hold accountable those who deliberately peddle fake news to manipulate public perception. Ortega highlighted the gravity of the situation, stating that the ICC, an international tribunal, has been dragged into this web of lies, potentially jeopardizing the integrity of the legal process. His concerns echo those of other lawmakers who have witnessed the escalating disinformation campaign.
Legal experts have also weighed in on the potential ramifications of the disinformation campaign. Lawyer Kristina Conti has warned that these online attacks could backfire on Duterte, potentially invoking provisions within the Rome Statute against such actions. ICC-accredited lawyer Joel Butuyan shares this concern, suggesting that the online harassment targeting the ICC and its judges could negatively impact Duterte’s plea for interim release. These legal opinions underscore the seriousness of the situation and the potential consequences of the disinformation campaign for Duterte’s legal standing.
Duterte’s arrest stemmed from the ICC’s investigation into the alleged crimes against humanity committed during his administration’s controversial war on drugs. The former president was apprehended at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport on March 11, 2025, with local authorities assisting Interpol in enforcing the ICC’s arrest warrant. After initially questioning the arrest, Duterte ultimately complied, boarding a chartered plane bound for the Netherlands to face the charges against him.
The disinformation surrounding Duterte’s arrest isn’t an isolated incident. Iloilo 1st District Rep. Janette Garin, a former Health Secretary, has also criticized the spread of misinformation, particularly from Duterte’s camp. She recalled her past experiences working with the Dutch, highlighting their meticulousness and consideration for individuals’ health and well-being, contradicting narratives suggesting mistreatment of Duterte. Garin’s statement further underscores the importance of countering false narratives with factual information and firsthand experience. The ongoing disinformation campaign surrounding Duterte’s ICC arrest highlights the challenges posed by the rapid spread of false information in the digital age, particularly its potential to undermine legal processes and erode public trust in institutions. The international community is watching closely as the legal proceedings unfold and the fight against disinformation continues.
