Pakistan’s Disinformation Campaign Targets Nepal Amidst Protests
Nepal recently witnessed a wave of protests sparked by internal issues, including unemployment and corruption. However, these legitimate grievances were swiftly hijacked by a coordinated disinformation campaign originating from Pakistan. This operation sought to portray the protests not as a reflection of domestic discontent, but as a product of Indian interference, painting India as a destabilizing force in the region. The campaign followed a well-established playbook, leveraging social media manipulation and traditional media outlets to disseminate false narratives and sow discord between Nepal and India.
The disinformation campaign began with seemingly innocuous posts by known Pakistani propagandists, including self-proclaimed defense analysts. These individuals accused India of orchestrating the protests to punish Nepal for its diplomatic engagements with China. They amplified pre-existing anti-India sentiment within Nepal and linked the situation to alleged Indian interference in other South Asian nations like Sri Lanka, Maldives, and Bangladesh. This narrative quickly gained traction through a network of interconnected accounts, including semi-automated bots and larger influencer profiles.
The initial posts were then amplified by a network of larger accounts, some boasting hundreds of thousands of followers. These amplifiers lent credibility to the otherwise fringe claims, giving them a wider reach and a veneer of legitimacy. This coordinated amplification created an echo chamber effect, where the same disinformation was repeated and retweeted across numerous accounts, creating the illusion of widespread belief in the fabricated narrative. The amplification stage is crucial in this playbook as it transitions the disinformation from obscure corners of the internet to mainstream social media discourse.
Traditional media outlets, particularly those with pro-Pakistani leanings, further solidified the narrative. The Kashmir Media Service, and other similar outlets presented the social media claims as news, often quoting the same Pakistani social media users as “commentators” or “experts.” This created a circular referencing system, where social media posts became the source for “news articles,” which then legitimized the original social media posts. This tactic effectively obscured the origins of the disinformation and created a false sense of validation through seemingly independent media reporting.
The campaign relied heavily on familiar tactics of disinformation warfare, including the use of thematic hashtags and framing devices. Hashtags like “India = Net Destabiliser” were promoted to counter India’s image as a regional security provider. This framing attempted to shift the blame for regional instability onto India, while simultaneously promoting a narrative of Pakistani innocence. The use of both English and Urdu language posts ensured that the message reached both international and regional audiences, maximizing its impact. These tactics represent a calculated effort to undermine India’s standing in the region.
This disinformation campaign utilized a sophisticated network of actors, ranging from semi-automated “cyborg” accounts to established influencers and legacy disinformation spreaders known for their anti-India rhetoric. These actors played distinct roles in the campaign, from initiating the false narrative to amplifying it and ultimately legitimizing it through seemingly credible media outlets. This coordinated effort demonstrated a high level of organization and intent, suggesting a deliberate strategy to manipulate online discourse and influence public opinion.
The choice of Nepal as the target for this disinformation operation is strategic. Nepal’s geographical location, sandwiched between India and China, makes it susceptible to narratives of great power rivalry. Historical sensitivities and border disputes further fuel anti-India sentiment, providing fertile ground for disinformation to take root. Moreover, Nepal’s current political climate, marked by disillusionment and instability, makes its population more receptive to external narratives that blame foreign influence for domestic problems. By targeting Nepal, Pakistan aims to portray India as a meddlesome neighbor, attempting to project this image across the entire South Asian region.
The implications of this disinformation campaign extend far beyond Nepal. It represents a broader struggle for narrative control in South Asia, with Pakistan aiming to undermine India’s diplomatic standing and portray it as a destabilizing force. By creating a narrative of Indian interference, Pakistan attempts to deflect attention from its own domestic issues and sow discord between India and its neighbors. This disinformation war has real-world consequences, eroding trust between nations and potentially exacerbating existing tensions.
For Nepal, the consequences are particularly damaging. The disinformation campaign distorts the legitimate grievances of the protesters, undermining their credibility and potentially hindering their efforts to bring about meaningful change. It also risks polarizing Nepali society along fabricated foreign-policy lines, diverting attention from pressing domestic issues. The campaign effectively hijacks genuine concerns and redirects them towards a manufactured geopolitical conflict.
This incident underscores the growing threat of disinformation in the digital age. The ability of malicious actors to manipulate online narratives and influence public opinion poses a serious challenge to regional stability. It is crucial for governments, media organizations, and individuals to be vigilant in identifying and countering disinformation campaigns, promoting media literacy and fostering critical thinking skills. The case of Nepal serves as a stark reminder of how easily disinformation can be weaponized to undermine legitimate movements and sow discord between nations.
