Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Social Media’s Escalating Role in the Israeli-Iranian Conflict

June 21, 2025

Disinformation Tactics Evolve in the Israeli-Iranian Conflict

June 21, 2025

Leveraging Game Theory to Counter Misinformation Campaigns Targeting Minority Atrocities in India.

June 21, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Social Media»Digital Rights Group Highlights Risks of Partisan Enforcement
Social Media

Digital Rights Group Highlights Risks of Partisan Enforcement

Press RoomBy Press RoomJune 21, 2025
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Karnataka Proposes Strict New Law to Combat Fake News with Hefty Penalties

Bangalore, June 21, 2025 – The Karnataka government has unveiled a draft bill aimed at curbing the spread of misinformation and fake news on social media platforms. The proposed Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Act, 2025, introduces stringent penalties for individuals found guilty of creating or disseminating false information online, including imprisonment of up to seven years and a maximum fine of Rs 10 lakh. The draft legislation marks a significant step by the state government to address the growing concerns surrounding the proliferation of false narratives and their impact on public order and social harmony. The bill is currently open for public consultation and is expected to be tabled in the upcoming legislative assembly session.

The proposed act defines "misinformation" as false or misleading information presented as news, while "fake news" is defined as fabricated content intentionally designed to deceive or mislead. The legislation covers a wide range of digital platforms, including social media networks, messaging apps, and websites. It empowers designated authorities to investigate complaints related to the spread of misinformation and take action against those responsible. The bill also outlines provisions for the removal of fake news content from online platforms and mandates cooperation from social media intermediaries in facilitating investigations. The move has sparked a debate about the potential implications for freedom of speech and expression, with some critics expressing concerns about the broad scope of the legislation and the potential for its misuse.

Supporters of the bill argue that the legislation is crucial to combat the detrimental effects of fake news, which they say can incite violence, spread hatred, and undermine public trust in institutions. They highlight recent incidents where the rapid spread of misinformation through social media platforms led to real-world consequences, including communal clashes and public panic. Proponents maintain that the proposed penalties are necessary to deter individuals from engaging in the creation and dissemination of false information and to ensure accountability in the online space. They stress the importance of balancing the right to free speech with the need to protect citizens from the harms caused by fake news.

However, critics of the proposed act raise concerns about the potential for its misuse to stifle dissent and suppress legitimate criticism. They argue that the broad definitions of "misinformation" and "fake news" could be used to target individuals expressing unpopular opinions or challenging the government’s narrative. They also question the effectiveness of such measures in addressing the root causes of misinformation, arguing that focusing solely on punitive measures may not be sufficient to counter the complex phenomenon of fake news propagation. Furthermore, critics express concerns about the potential impact on the freedom of the press and the ability of journalists to report on sensitive issues without fear of prosecution.

The draft bill outlines a multi-tiered approach to address the issue of fake news, including preventive measures, investigative powers, and penal provisions. It proposes the establishment of a state-level fact-checking unit to verify the authenticity of information circulating online and to debunk false narratives. The unit will also be responsible for raising public awareness about misinformation and promoting media literacy. The legislation empowers designated officers to issue takedown notices to social media platforms for the removal of fake news content. In cases where the platform fails to comply with the takedown request, the officer can initiate legal proceedings against the intermediary.

The proposed penalties under the Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Act are significantly higher than those stipulated in similar laws enacted by other states. This reflects the Karnataka government’s firm stance against the spread of fake news and its commitment to creating a safer online environment. The government maintains that the stringent penalties are necessary to deter the creation and spread of misinformation and to protect the public from its harmful consequences. However, the bill’s critics argue that such harsh penalties could have a chilling effect on free speech and may disproportionately impact marginalized communities. The debate surrounding the proposed legislation is likely to continue as the bill undergoes public scrutiny and legislative review. The Karnataka government has invited public comments and suggestions on the draft bill, and the feedback received will be considered before the final version is tabled in the assembly. The outcome of this process will shape the future of online discourse in the state and may serve as a model for other states grappling with the challenge of combating fake news.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Social Media’s Escalating Role in the Israeli-Iranian Conflict

June 21, 2025

Disinformation Tactics Evolve in the Israeli-Iranian Conflict

June 21, 2025

President Marcos to Address Misinformation and Disinformation in Fourth State of the Nation Address.

June 20, 2025

Our Picks

Disinformation Tactics Evolve in the Israeli-Iranian Conflict

June 21, 2025

Leveraging Game Theory to Counter Misinformation Campaigns Targeting Minority Atrocities in India.

June 21, 2025

Digital Rights Group Highlights Risks of Partisan Enforcement

June 21, 2025

The Case for Social Media Regulation Remains Strong Despite Allegations of False Bias

June 21, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

News

HPPSC Refutes Cheating Allegations and Condemns Misinformation Regarding Constable Recruitment Examination

By Press RoomJune 21, 20250

Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Denies Irregularities in Police Constable Recruitment Exam Amidst Allegations of…

Juniata County Campground Clarifies Details Following River Rescue

June 21, 2025

Russian Disinformation Campaign Falsely Claims Detention of Poles in Ukraine for Displaying National Symbols

June 21, 2025

Technologically Driven Misinformation Obscures the Iran-Israel Conflict

June 21, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.