Texas Flooding Fuels Geoengineering Conspiracy Theories Despite Scientific Evidence
Over 100 lives were tragically lost in the devastating flash floods that ravaged homes and campsites along the Guadalupe River in Texas in the early hours of Friday morning. While communities grappled with the immense loss and ongoing rescue efforts, a wave of misinformation and conspiracy theories quickly spread across social media, falsely blaming the disaster on geoengineering and weather manipulation. Right-wing influencers, politicians, and conspiracy theorists seized upon the tragedy to promote unfounded claims, diverting attention from the genuine meteorological factors that led to the catastrophic flooding.
Despite the National Weather Service having issued warnings about potential heavy rainfall in the region days in advance, prominent figures like Kandiss Taylor, a GOP congressional candidate, and Kylie Jane Kremer, executive director of Women for America First, publicly questioned the natural occurrence of the floods, insinuating artificial manipulation. Their posts, viewed millions of times, fueled an online frenzy of speculation and distrust, exacerbating the emotional toll of the disaster on affected communities and hampering relief efforts.
The conspiracy theories escalated further when US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene announced her intention to introduce legislation banning weather modification and geoengineering. Citing the Texas floods as justification, Greene echoed the sentiments of those promoting unsubstantiated claims. The proposed bill mirrors legislation recently passed in Florida, making weather modification a felony offense. Critics argue that such legislation, based on misinformation, could hinder legitimate scientific research and potentially impede critical weather management strategies.
At the center of the conspiracy storm is Jake Doricko, CEO of Rainmaker, a cloud seeding company. Right-wing influencer Gabrielle Yoder and disgraced former national security advisor Michael Flynn explicitly accused Doricko and his company of causing the Texas floods through cloud seeding operations. Doricko vehemently denied these allegations, explaining that Rainmaker had actually canceled planned operations in the region days before the floods due to high moisture content. He emphasized that the cloud seeding operation was intended for an area over 100 miles away from the hardest-hit region.
The scientific community unequivocally rejects the notion that cloud seeding could have caused the devastating floods. Meteorologists emphasize that cloud seeding, a technique used to enhance precipitation in existing clouds, cannot create storms of this magnitude or intensity. The process is likened to “icing a cake,” enhancing existing moisture, not conjuring storms out of thin air. Experts confirm that the meteorological conditions, including moisture from Tropical Storm Barry, were already in place to create the severe rainfall, independent of any cloud seeding activity.
The Texas floods, a tragic natural disaster, have become a breeding ground for misinformation and conspiracy theories, fueled by social media and opportunistic political figures. The promotion of these unfounded claims not only undermines trust in science and meteorological expertise but also distracts from the real issues surrounding disaster preparedness and response. The focus should remain on supporting affected communities, improving infrastructure resilience, and heeding accurate weather forecasts, rather than perpetuating unsubstantiated theories that hinder recovery efforts and sow discord. Jake Doricko, caught in the crosshairs of this misinformation campaign, has publicly refuted the accusations, highlighting the importance of transparency and scientific accuracy in discussions about weather modification technology.
