Congress Disbands Key Weapon Against Foreign Disinformation, Leaving US Vulnerable
In a move with potentially far-reaching consequences for US national security, Congress has effectively dismantled the Global Engagement Center (GEC), a State Department unit tasked with countering foreign propaganda and disinformation campaigns. The GEC’s demise came at the end of December 2024, after House Republicans repeatedly blocked its reauthorization, leaving the US increasingly vulnerable to the manipulative narratives propagated by adversaries such as Russia, China, and Iran.
While Republicans ostensibly supported the GEC’s core mission, their opposition stemmed from criticisms of the Center’s operational methods. Central to their critique was the GEC’s controversial contract with the Global Disinformation Index (GDI), a British firm that had labeled some US conservative media outlets as extremist. Although the GEC’s contract with GDI focused on analyzing Chinese disinformation campaigns in Southeast Asia and had no bearing on US media, the association provided ammunition for Republican critics, who accused the Biden administration of failing to address the issue transparently and directly.
This controversy, however, overshadowed the GEC’s significant achievements in countering foreign disinformation efforts abroad. The Center played a vital role in exposing Russian and Chinese disinformation operations in regions spanning Latin America, Africa, and Moldova, including uncovering a Russian campaign spreading conspiracy theories about biological weapons. The GEC also published comprehensive reports detailing China’s multi-billion dollar investment in global information control through disinformation and propaganda, and in early 2024, spearheaded a multinational agreement to counter state-sponsored disinformation. These accomplishments underscore the critical role the GEC played in safeguarding US interests and promoting factual narratives on the international stage.
Beyond the GDI controversy, Republican opposition stemmed from broader concerns regarding the potential for the "disinformation" label to be weaponized against dissenting viewpoints. They accused the GEC of being complicit in a campaign to suppress politically inconvenient narratives, echoing a wider anxiety surrounding the policing of online speech. However, these claims lacked substantive evidence, as the GEC’s mandate focused exclusively on foreign operations and did not target or restrict American free speech in any way. Republicans frequently cited a 2023 federal court ruling that criticized certain government agencies’ interactions with social media companies, but that ruling explicitly excluded the State Department and the GEC from any First Amendment violations.
The shuttering of the GEC has been met with undisguised satisfaction by some of the very entities it sought to counter. Russian state-funded media outlets, which had been frequent targets of GEC’s fact-checking efforts, celebrated its demise. This ironic twist highlights the impact the GEC had in challenging the Kremlin’s disinformation campaigns and underscores the strategic blow its closure represents to US efforts to counter malign foreign influence.
The absence of the GEC leaves a critical gap in the US government’s arsenal against foreign disinformation campaigns. While domestic efforts to disrupt information manipulation fall under the purview of US law enforcement agencies, like the Justice Department’s recent charges against Russia Today employees for money laundering and failing to register as foreign agents, the GEC played a unique role in combating these narratives abroad. Now, the incoming Congress and the new leadership at the State Department face the urgent task of reconstructing this crucial capability, potentially under a new name and with new leadership, but with the same overarching objective: to counter the disinformation campaigns waged by Russia, China, and Iran and protect US interests on the global stage. The stakes are high, as these adversarial nations show no signs of relenting in their information warfare efforts, leaving the US increasingly vulnerable in the absence of a dedicated entity to counter their manipulative narratives.
