Grassroots Republican Revolt Challenges Rep. Lori McCann’s Voting Record in Idaho District 6
LEWISTON, Idaho – A simmering discontent within the Republican ranks of Idaho’s Legislative District 6 has erupted into a formal challenge against Representative Lori McCann, sparked by her 2025 voting record. Contrary to McCann’s characterization of the proceedings as a "tribunal" and an unfair attack, the initiative is a grassroots effort driven by Republican precinct committee officers and concerned constituents who believe McCann has strayed from the core values of the party. The process, governed by Article XX of the Idaho Republican Party rules, allows for the censure or reprimand of elected officials deemed to have deviated from party principles.
The catalyst for this action stems from a perceived disconnect between McCann’s legislative actions and the expectations of her Republican constituents. The movement gained momentum when precinct committee officers, responding to complaints from voters within the district, initiated the Article XX process. The petition calling for a review of McCann’s voting record garnered overwhelming support from these local party leaders, demonstrating a widespread sentiment of dissatisfaction. This groundswell of opposition counters McCann’s narrative of being unfairly targeted and underscores the depth of concern within the Republican base.
McCann’s claim of holding the highest vote count amongst District 6 legislators has been challenged as misleading. While she may have secured the most votes in the general election, critics point to the 2024 Republican primary, a more pertinent gauge of party support, where she received only 43.6% of the vote. This indicates that a majority of Republican voters opted for other candidates, raising questions about her mandate within the party. The Article XX process, proponents argue, is not a personal attack but a mechanism to ensure elected officials remain accountable to the platform and principles of the Republican Party.
Dispelling accusations of procedural irregularities, it has been confirmed that McCann was duly notified of the petition against her. She received notification via email on May 1st and again through certified mail on May 15th, complying fully with party regulations. Furthermore, McCann has had access to the complete petition text since then, allowing her ample opportunity to review the specific concerns raised against her voting record. This transparency contradicts McCann’s claims of being uninformed about the nature of the proceedings.
The controversy surrounding the petition extends to the disclosure of signatories. McCann has repeatedly demanded the names of those who signed the petition, a request deemed unnecessary as party rules do not mandate public disclosure of signatory information. This demand has been interpreted by some as an attempt to intimidate or pressure grassroots volunteers. Those overseeing the process maintain that if McCann believes the process is flawed, she should pursue established channels for challenging it rather than resorting to what they perceive as harassment of precinct committee officers.
Bryan Smith, Chairman of the Bonneville County Republican Central Committee, has stepped forward to address McCann’s demands. He affirms his own involvement in both signing and collecting signatures for the petition, effectively challenging McCann’s assertions. Smith’s public acknowledgment of his participation underscores the grassroots nature of the movement and provides a direct response to McCann’s calls for transparency and accountability. The ongoing dispute highlights the growing rift within the Idaho Republican Party and raises questions about the future of McCann’s political career within the party. The outcome of the Article XX process could have significant implications for the party’s unity and direction in the upcoming election cycles.
