House Probes Social Media Disinformation, Vloggers Testify After Initial Absences
The Philippine House of Representatives is actively investigating the pervasive issue of misinformation and disinformation spreading across social media platforms. A tri-committee, composed of the House committees on public order and safety, public information, and information and communication technology, held a hearing on Friday to address this growing concern. Notably, several online vloggers, some of whom had previously skipped two hearings, appeared before the committee after warnings of potential contempt charges. Among those present were former Presidential Communications Office Secretary Trixie Cruz-Angeles, Elizabeth Joie Cruz, MJ Quiambao-Reyes, Krizette Laureta Chu, Dr. Richard Mata, Dr. Ethel Pineda Garcia, Mark Anthony Lopez, and Aeron Peña. These individuals were sworn in to testify truthfully regarding their involvement and observations of online disinformation.
The tri-committee’s investigation was prompted by a series of resolutions and privilege speeches delivered by concerned lawmakers who highlighted the damaging effects of false information online. Representative Dan Fernandez, co-chairperson of the tri-committee, emphasized the House’s authority to compel individuals to testify, underscoring the seriousness of the probe. The absence of certain vloggers in previous hearings prompted warnings about potential contempt orders. While some, like Elizabeth Joie Cruz, appeared in person, others, including Allan Troy "Sass" Rogando Sasot, Jeffrey Almendras Celiz, and former PCO undersecretary Lorraine Marie Badoy-Partosa, remained absent. Attempts by Sasot to participate virtually were denied, as online participation is reserved for House members.
The urgency of this investigation is underscored by the widespread proliferation of disinformation and its potential to manipulate public opinion and even incite unrest. Representative Robert Ace Barbers, who delivered a privilege speech on the matter, emphasized the need for a regulatory framework governing social media use, similar to the ethical standards applied to traditional media outlets. Barbers’ call for regulation stems from personal experience with false rumors targeting him and fellow members of the House quad-committee investigating illegal activities related to Philippine offshore gaming operators, the illicit drug trade, and extrajudicial killings.
The Philippines, with its high rate of social media usage, is particularly vulnerable to the spread of misinformation. This vulnerability was clearly demonstrated in May 2024 when "deepfake" videos featuring a manipulated voice mimicking President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. falsely claimed that the Philippines was preparing for war with China. The Presidential Communications Office (PCO) swiftly debunked these videos, clarifying that the President had issued no such orders to the Armed Forces of the Philippines. The incident emphasized the potential of sophisticated disinformation campaigns to create confusion and undermine public trust.
Further exemplifying the ongoing challenge of misinformation, false narratives circulated online following the hypothetical scenario of former president Rodrigo Duterte being taken into custody by the International Criminal Court. Some Duterte supporters shared social media posts claiming that the Supreme Court had received a petition with 16 million signatures demanding President Marcos’ resignation. The Office of the Supreme Court spokesperson Camille Ting promptly refuted these claims, confirming that no such document had been received or issued by the High Tribunal. This incident highlights how swiftly misinformation can spread and the importance of verifying information from credible sources.
The ongoing House investigation underscores the critical need to address the proliferation of disinformation in the digital age. As the Philippines grapples with the challenge of maintaining a healthy information ecosystem, the tri-committee’s work will be instrumental in exploring potential solutions, including the possibility of a regulatory framework for social media. The testimony of vloggers, while incomplete, provides valuable insights into the mechanisms and reach of online disinformation campaigns. The investigation serves as a crucial step towards ensuring that Filipinos can access reliable information and are protected from the harmful effects of misinformation. The ultimate goal is to foster a more informed and discerning citizenry, capable of navigating the complexities of the digital information landscape.
