Nigeria’s Disinformation Epidemic: A Slow-Moving Coup Against Collective Memory
Nigeria is grappling with a disinformation crisis that transcends the mere distortion of facts. This insidious assault targets the very core of the nation’s identity, fracturing collective memory and undermining the foundations of its democracy. Sophisticated campaigns utilizing AI-generated propaganda, click-farmed influencers, and digitally spread rumors are not isolated incidents but rather a concerted effort to reshape reality and erode public trust. This manipulation extends to rewriting historical narratives, inverting resistance movements, and scrambling communal memory, thereby fragmenting the civic imagination and jeopardizing the nation’s stability. In a country with fragile democratic structures and limited official archives, collective memory serves as the bedrock of legitimacy. Disinformation, left unchecked, constitutes a slow, insidious coup against this legitimacy, threatening to unravel the fabric of Nigerian society.
The disinformation epidemic manifests differently across Nigeria, exploiting existing historical wounds and political fault lines. In the Northwest, false narratives fuel security crises, exacerbating tensions between Hausa communities and marginalized ethnic groups. Bandit leaders are often romanticized online, undermining both state authority and community resistance. In the Northeast, manipulated images portray insurgents as benevolent providers, aiming to normalize extremist governance in the absence of a strong state presence. Rumors replace factual information, turning propaganda into a distorted form of public service. In the North-Central and Middle Belt regions, disinformation takes on a highly ethnicized dimension. Rumors of impending attacks and manipulated videos of inter-communal violence spread through WhatsApp, disrupting peace efforts and justifying retaliatory actions. These areas remain vulnerable due to complex and overlapping fault lines of faith, land, and historical memory.
In the Southeast, the disinformation landscape is marked by both secessionist and state-sponsored propaganda. Conflicting narratives surrounding protests, military operations, and civic unrest further polarize the region. Videos are manipulated, slogans fabricated, and competing narratives emerge, each seeking to discredit the other’s version of truth. The Southwest, particularly Lagos, experiences a more urban and elite-coded form of disinformation. Influencer armies, digital satire, and TikTok revisionism flood the information space with noise, parody, and distraction, aiming to dilute the impact of past violence and erode historical memory. The South-South, especially the Niger Delta, sees disinformation campaigns centered around resource justice. Fabricated environmental reports, edited protest footage, and misattributed community statements sow discord among oil-host communities and undermine the legitimacy of their grievances.
The cumulative effect of these regional disinformation campaigns is a weakened capacity for collective memory, a fragmented understanding of truth, and a democracy that struggles to recognize its own reflection. The erosion of trust is perhaps the most dangerous consequence. Disinformation corrodes faith in the media, institutions, and ultimately, in fellow citizens. When people can no longer discern what happened, who to believe, or whether their own memories are valid, the civic commons begins to unravel. Public spaces—bus stops, town halls, churches, and community radio stations—become breeding grounds for confusion rather than sources of clarity. Simplistic ethnic caricatures replace nuanced understanding, civic rituals lose their symbolic power, and the republic gradually transforms into a landscape of rumors and uncertainty.
Addressing this crisis requires more than just fact-checking; it demands a comprehensive approach to memory-checking. Nigeria needs a framework for civic repair that rebuilds ethical relationships with truth, history, and shared narratives. This framework must be rooted in dignity, empathy, and a recognition of plural memory. Memory itself must be recognized as a crucial element of societal infrastructure – as vital as roads, bridges, and communication networks. It’s the framework upon which shared understanding and trust are built. A strategic approach entails mapping how disinformation manipulates collective memory concerning protests, elections, civic tragedies, and moments of public joy. This mapping will illuminate how rumors target individuals and institutions, turning town halls into echo chambers and transport hubs into rumor mills.
Furthermore, restoring cultural integrity is paramount. This involves tracking how regional and ethnic identities are distorted, erased, or scapegoated in historical narratives. It also necessitates cultivating communities and coalitions committed to safeguarding memory and defending civic history with unwavering dedication. Protecting the collective memory is not simply about preserving the past; it is about safeguarding the future. If Nigeria fails to defend its memory commons, it risks losing the ability to understand itself and its people, becoming governable only through fear or myth. The fight against disinformation is a fight for the soul of the nation, a struggle to reclaim the shared narrative and rebuild the foundation of a healthy democracy.
