Online Platforms Fail to Curb Climate Disinformation Despite New EU Regulations
The escalating climate crisis underscores the urgent need to combat the spread of misinformation online. A recent report by the EU DisinfoLab reveals a concerning lack of progress by major online platforms in addressing climate disinformation, despite the implementation of the Digital Services Act (DSA) in the European Union. The DSA, while intended to enhance online safety and accountability, fails to explicitly categorize climate disinformation as a “systemic risk,” leaving platforms with considerable leeway in their enforcement efforts. This regulatory gap has allowed platforms to largely sidestep their responsibility to tackle the proliferation of harmful climate narratives, hindering effective climate action and informed public discourse.
The report, an update to a 2023 analysis, examines the policies of six major platforms: Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), and LinkedIn. It finds a worrying trend of stagnation and even regression in some cases. While TikTok remains the sole platform with a dedicated climate disinformation policy, its enforcement remains limited in scope. Other platforms, like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, X, and LinkedIn, either rely on general misinformation guidelines or offer no specific framework whatsoever, effectively treating climate disinformation as a marginal issue. This lack of dedicated policies reveals a stark disconnect between the urgency of the climate crisis and the platforms’ commitment to combating related misinformation.
YouTube’s refusal to engage with third-party fact-checkers under the DSA sets a troubling precedent, further weakening accountability mechanisms. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has seemingly deprioritized climate action by removing references to its Climate Science Center and Climate Info Finder from public documentation. This suggests a shift away from providing users with reliable climate information, potentially exacerbating the spread of misinformation. Furthermore, none of the platforms have implemented specific measures to address the growing threat of AI-generated climate disinformation, despite the increasing sophistication of synthetic media used in denial and greenwashing campaigns.
The report highlights the platforms’ failure to address the role of recommender systems in amplifying climate disinformation. None of the assessed platforms include climate-related risks in their systemic risk assessments as required by the DSA, demonstrating a lack of recognition of the profound impact these systems can have on shaping public perception and discourse around climate change. The amplification of misleading narratives through algorithmic echo chambers can solidify entrenched beliefs and hinder public acceptance of crucial climate action measures.
While some platforms have implemented limited measures, such as demonetizing certain climate-related ads, these efforts are narrow in scope, inconsistently enforced, and rarely applied to unpaid organic content, where much of the disinformation spreads. Platforms that previously acknowledged climate disinformation, like Meta, now address it only under broad misinformation categories, without updating their enforcement frameworks. This lack of clear, climate-specific policies and enforcement mechanisms underscores the inadequacy of current platform responses.
The absence of climate-specific appeal pathways, transparency regarding content takedowns, and defined enforcement thresholds leaves users with little recourse. This lack of clarity and accountability further erodes trust in the platforms and limits the effectiveness of efforts to combat climate disinformation. The report calls for a dual framework of policy and platform action, urging EU institutions to designate climate disinformation as a systemic risk and mandating platforms to adopt transparent, climate-specific moderation systems. Without these crucial steps, the EU’s digital governance goals, and its climate transition targets, remain vulnerable to the unchecked proliferation of climate disinformation. The report underscores the urgency of addressing this critical issue, emphasizing that inaction by platforms and regulators alike poses a significant threat to effective climate action and informed public discourse. The failure to adequately address the spread of climate disinformation undermines the credibility of online platforms and jeopardizes the collective efforts needed to address the climate crisis.
