Calgary City Councillor Proposes External Review of Misinformation’s Impact on Council Decisions
Calgary City Councillor Courtney Walcott is spearheading an initiative to address the growing concern of misinformation influencing council decisions and public discourse. He plans to introduce a motion in March urging council to commission an external review examining the role of false information in shaping key city matters. This review, according to Walcott, is not intended as real-time fact-checking, but rather a retrospective analysis of how misinformation has impacted past decisions and public perception. He specifically cited two 2024 examples: the city’s upzoning decision and the unsuccessful Glenmore Landing redevelopment proposal, both of which were subject to the spread of inaccurate information online and in public forums. Walcott emphasizes the importance of understanding the pervasiveness of misinformation and its potential to undermine public trust and informed decision-making.
Walcott’s proposed review is intended to dissect the nuanced landscape of false information by examining the distinctions between misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation. He defines misinformation as the unintentional spread of false information due to a lack of factual understanding. Disinformation, on the other hand, involves the deliberate dissemination of false information. Malinformation represents the most damaging form, where false information is intentionally spread with the explicit goal of causing harm. Walcott expressed concern that even after city administration corrects inaccuracies, some councillors continue to cite false information presented at meetings, highlighting the insidious nature of the problem.
The impetus for this review emerged during a meeting of the council’s audit committee, where discussions centered on the erosion of the city’s corporate reputation due to declining public trust. This concern resonates with Walcott’s belief that misinformation plays a significant role in shaping public perception and ultimately influencing council decisions. Chief Administrative Officer David Duckworth responded positively to the proposal, indicating his willingness to discuss the review with city auditor Liz Ormsby. This suggests a potential pathway for the review to gain traction within the city administration.
The city is not entirely unprepared for this challenge. Chris Arthurs, General Manager of People, Innovation and Collaboration Services, revealed ongoing efforts to equip city staff with the tools to navigate the complexities of misinformation. Arthurs explained that communications teams, including those managing social media and the city’s website, have undergone training specifically focused on distinguishing between misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation. This training informs internal communication strategies, interactions with city council, and public engagement. While these training initiatives are a step in the right direction, Walcott believes a comprehensive review is necessary to fully grasp the extent of the issue and develop more robust countermeasures.
Walcott’s determination to bring this motion forward underscores the urgency he attaches to addressing the problem of misinformation. He argues that allowing false information to influence policy decisions carries significant risks and potential harm to the community. His commitment to putting the motion before council regardless of initial support demonstrates his belief that this issue cannot be ignored. The review, he hopes, will provide a foundation for developing more effective strategies to combat misinformation, restore public trust, and ensure that decisions are based on accurate information.
The potential implications of this review extend beyond the immediate concerns of Calgary. As misinformation continues to proliferate in the digital age, municipalities across the globe are grappling with similar challenges. Calgary’s proactive approach, if successful, could serve as a model for other cities seeking to protect the integrity of their decision-making processes and maintain public trust in local government. The outcome of this initiative will be closely watched by those concerned about the corrosive effects of misinformation on democratic institutions and public discourse. Walcott’s proposal represents a crucial step towards understanding and addressing a complex problem that poses a growing threat to informed governance. The success of this endeavor will depend on the willingness of council to embrace the findings of the review and implement the necessary changes to ensure that accurate information forms the basis of all city decisions.
