Armenia Rejects Azerbaijani Accusations of Border Fire, Calls for Joint Investigation Mechanism
YEREVAN, Armenia – Tensions continue to simmer between Armenia and Azerbaijan as the Armenian Ministry of Defense (MoD) categorically denied accusations leveled by its Azerbaijani counterpart of cross-border firing. The Azerbaijani MoD claimed that Armenian forces targeted their positions in the eastern and southeastern sectors of the border between 10:20 pm on Tuesday and 1:40 am on Wednesday. Armenia swiftly rejected these claims, branding them as baseless and inconsistent with reality. This latest exchange of accusations further underscores the fragile peace and deep-seated mistrust that persist between the two nations, still grappling with the aftermath of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war.
The Armenian MoD emphasized its commitment to transparency and accountability, highlighting a proposal put forth by the Armenian Prime Minister’s Office for the establishment of a joint Armenia-Azerbaijan mechanism to investigate ceasefire violations and related allegations. This mechanism, Armenia argues, would provide a neutral platform for verifying claims and dispelling misinformation, thereby contributing to de-escalation and fostering greater trust. Crucially, Armenia pointed out that Azerbaijan has yet to respond to this proposal, casting doubt on Baku’s commitment to resolving disputes through peaceful and transparent means.
Armenia, reiterating its commitment to upholding the ceasefire, expressed its willingness to investigate the Azerbaijani allegations if provided with concrete evidence. The MoD stressed that, despite the accusations, Azerbaijan has failed to furnish any factual basis or supporting evidence to substantiate its claims. This lack of transparency, according to the Armenian side, further undermines the credibility of the Azerbaijani accusations and raises questions about the motivations behind them.
The absence of a tangible response from Azerbaijan to the proposed joint investigation mechanism underscores the challenges in establishing a sustainable peace in the region. The mechanism, as envisioned by Armenia, would function as a crucial instrument for conflict resolution, ensuring impartial investigations and holding both sides accountable for any breach of the ceasefire agreement. The continued lack of engagement from Azerbaijan on this initiative, coupled with the recent exchange of accusations, raises concerns about the potential for further escalation.
This latest incident highlights the urgent need for international engagement and mediation to prevent further deterioration of the situation along the Armenia-Azerbaijan border. The international community, particularly the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs (France, Russia, and the United States), should actively encourage both parties to engage in constructive dialogue and embrace the proposed joint investigation mechanism. A robust international presence and monitoring mechanisms are crucial to deter further violations and create an environment conducive to meaningful negotiations.
Moreover, the international community should pressure Azerbaijan to respond to the proposal for a joint investigation mechanism and demonstrate a genuine commitment to de-escalation. The establishment of such a mechanism is not merely a procedural matter; it is a fundamental step towards building trust and fostering a sustainable peace process. Without a transparent and accountable mechanism for addressing ceasefire violations, the risk of miscalculation and escalation remains high. The onus is on both Armenia and Azerbaijan to prioritize dialogue and cooperation to prevent the fragile peace from unraveling. The international community’s role is vital in facilitating this process and ensuring that the hard-won progress toward peace is not squandered.
