Parliamentary Committee Recommends User Empowerment and Enhanced Privacy on Social Media Platforms
Canberra – A parliamentary committee investigating the impact of social media on Australian society has released its final report, recommending a range of measures to empower users and enhance privacy protections. While stopping short of endorsing an outright ban on under-16s accessing social media, the committee emphasized the need for user control over algorithms, greater data privacy, and increased digital literacy education. The report also calls for the government to explore options for strengthening its enforcement powers over digital platforms and introduce a duty of care for these platforms.
The committee’s recommendations come amidst a broader national debate on regulating social media, with both the Coalition opposition and the federal government pushing for legislation to ban users under 16 from accessing these platforms. However, the committee’s report highlighted "contrasting views" on the effectiveness of age-based restrictions, acknowledging that such a ban alone would not be sufficient to address the harms associated with social media. Instead, the committee urged the government to co-design any regulatory framework affecting young people with their direct involvement, recognizing their frustration at being excluded from the policy-making process.
The 12 recommendations put forward by the committee encompass various aspects of social media regulation. Key proposals include enabling users to modify, reset, or deactivate algorithms that control the content they see; providing users with greater control over their personal data; requiring platforms to grant data access to researchers and public interest organizations; and investing in digital literacy education. The committee also recommended a trial of age assurance technology and requested a parliamentary report on its outcomes.
Despite bipartisan support for a ban on under-16s accessing social media, the committee refrained from endorsing this policy. Committee Chair Sharon Claydon acknowledged the complexity of the issue, emphasizing that while an age limit might not be a perfect solution, it could offer valuable time to implement more comprehensive, long-term digital reforms. The committee highlighted the need for immediate action to protect Australian users, while also recognizing the absence of a single, definitive solution.
Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, Deputy Chair of the committee, echoed the sentiment that a blanket ban is not the answer. She stressed that making platforms safer requires more than simply restricting access for young people, advocating for a broader approach that addresses the underlying issues contributing to online harms. Hanson-Young called for a robust response to the influence of "toxic tech giants" and their potential impact on democracy and children.
Beyond the main report, additional recommendations have emerged from different political factions. The Greens have called for the release of the Online Safety Act review, a ban on data mining of young people’s information, enhanced digital literacy education, and the consideration of a digital services tax on social media platforms. Meanwhile, Coalition members have advocated for stricter measures, including mandatory scanning of encrypted messages for child abuse material and requiring search engines to actively combat pornographic content in search results and report on their actions. They also urged for a crackdown on "link in bio" tactics used to direct users to inappropriate or fraudulent websites.
The government’s selection of the UK-based Age Check Certification Scheme to conduct a six-month trial of age assurance technologies further complicates the landscape. This trial will assess various methods for verifying age, including ID credentials, age estimation, age inference, and parental controls. Importantly, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has indicated that all users, not just those under 16, will be subject to the age verification process. However, with the trial’s completion expected after parliament considers the legislation for the under-16 ban, and a 12-month implementation period for age assurance measures, the actual enforcement of the ban is likely to extend beyond the next federal election. This timeline introduces a layer of uncertainty and highlights the ongoing challenges in balancing online safety with user access and privacy.
