Armenia Rejects Azerbaijani Accusations of Ceasefire Violations, Renews Call for Joint Investigation Mechanism
YEREVAN, Armenia – Tensions continue to simmer between Armenia and Azerbaijan as the Armenian Ministry of Defense vehemently denied accusations of ceasefire violations leveled by its Azerbaijani counterpart. The Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense had claimed that Armenian forces opened fire on their positions in the eastern and southeastern sectors of the border between 5:00 p.m. on March 31 and 4:45 a.m. on April 1. Armenia categorically dismissed these allegations, labeling them as fabrications and inconsistent with the facts on the ground. This latest exchange of accusations underscores the deep-seated mistrust and fragile nature of the ceasefire agreement between the two countries.
The Armenian Defense Ministry’s statement reiterated a standing proposal by the Armenian Prime Minister’s Office to establish a joint mechanism with Azerbaijan to investigate ceasefire violations and the often-conflicting reports that follow. This mechanism, Armenia argues, would provide a transparent and impartial platform for verifying claims, preventing escalation, and fostering greater accountability. The absence of such a mechanism has allowed conflicting narratives to flourish, creating a breeding ground for mistrust and hindering efforts towards a sustainable peace. Despite repeated calls from Armenia, Azerbaijan has yet to formally respond to this proposal, leaving the initiative in limbo.
Armenia’s insistence on a joint investigation mechanism underscores its commitment to de-escalation and finding a peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict. By offering to investigate Azerbaijan’s claims, provided concrete evidence is presented, Armenia aims to demonstrate its good faith and willingness to engage in constructive dialogue. This proactive approach contrasts sharply with Azerbaijan’s perceived reluctance to embrace a transparent investigation process, raising questions about its commitment to upholding the ceasefire.
The unresolved dispute over the Nagorno-Karabakh region continues to be the primary source of tension between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The decades-long conflict, marked by periods of intense fighting and uneasy ceasefires, has claimed thousands of lives and displaced countless others. While a Russian-brokered ceasefire agreement in 2020 brought an end to the most recent large-scale hostilities, sporadic clashes and accusations of ceasefire breaches continue to plague the region, hindering the prospects for lasting peace.
The international community has repeatedly called on both sides to exercise restraint and engage in meaningful dialogue to resolve their differences. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group, co-chaired by France, Russia, and the United States, has played a mediating role in the conflict for several decades. However, reaching a comprehensive settlement has proven elusive, with deep-seated historical grievances and political sensitivities hindering progress.
The latest exchange of accusations highlights the urgent need for a robust and impartial mechanism to verify ceasefire violations. Such a mechanism could help to de-escalate tensions, promote transparency, and build trust between the two sides. Furthermore, it would contribute to creating a more conducive environment for substantive negotiations towards a lasting and peaceful resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, a goal that remains critical for regional stability and the well-being of the people affected by this protracted conflict. The international community should continue to encourage both Armenia and Azerbaijan to embrace dialogue and work towards a mechanism that ensures accountability and reduces the risk of further escalation. The continued absence of such a mechanism risks perpetuating the cycle of mistrust and violence, further delaying the prospects of peace in the region. The onus now falls on Azerbaijan to respond to Armenia’s proposal and demonstrate its commitment to a peaceful resolution.
